Evidence page

Look at the proof before you buy.

This page is about the German Manaslu Clothing UG / ManasluClo operation. It collects the clearest evidence in one place: supplier material, product-photo matches, public-record gaps, missing public test data, and the takedown complaint Manaslu submitted against this site.

Start with the proof Manaslu tried to shut us down Back to main page
SupplierChats show branded vests, caps being stitched, and a supplier saying they produced the brand item.
Photo matchesSide-by-side images show ManasluClo product photos matching Arc'teryx and Montane source photos.
EU onlyOne EU trademark record found. The US filing found here was rejected/refused.
DMCAManaslu tried to take this site offline. Netlify did not take action at that stage.

Core Proof

The strongest items first, using the original local evidence assets.

Supplier DM Branded vest New evidence

The vest evidence is direct: Alibaba account material, supplier chat, branded product, and low-cost listing.

The strongest new screenshots show an Alibaba platform profile with Lennart and company name Manaslu Clo, plus Manaslu-branded Taral One running vests inside supplier chats. One message says, "We are the supplier of this brand." Another says the supplier produced the item and was asked to keep it confidential.

  • Alibaba platform profile shows Lennart, Germany, and company name Manaslu Clo.
  • Supplier chat shows front and back photos of the branded Taral One vest.
  • Follow-up message says the supplier produced the brand item.
  • Alibaba listing shows a similar-looking running vest around the $9 range.
Supplier chat showing ManasluClo Taral One vest and saying we are the supplier of this brand
Supplier chat: branded Taral One vest, plus "We are the supplier of this brand."
Alibaba platform profile showing Lennart and company name Manaslu Clo
Alibaba platform profile: Lennart, Germany, company name Manaslu Clo.
Supplier chat saying they produced the running vest brand item and were asked to keep it confidential
Supplier chat: produced the brand item and was asked to keep it confidential.
Alibaba chat showing Taral One ManasluClo vest images
Supplier chat showing the Taral One vest images inside the conversation.
Alibaba running vest listing showing similar black running vest around 9 dollars
Alibaba running vest listing around the $9 range.
Cap trail Supplier chat Video

The cap evidence points to production, stitching, and supplier inventory.

The cap screenshots are stronger than generic Alibaba lookalikes. One chat shows Manaslu-branded caps being stitched after a bulk-order question. Another message says the next caps needed to be designed themselves "with your help."

  • Manaslu-branded caps are visible in supplier material.
  • Supplier chat refers to stitching the hats and finishing them soon.
  • The "next time" message undercuts a clean self-designed narrative.
Supplier video with Manaslu-branded caps in the warehouse material.
Supplier chat saying they are stitching the hats and showing Manaslu-branded caps
Supplier chat: "How's the bulk going?" and Manaslu-branded caps being stitched.
Alibaba listing screenshot for a hat resembling the ManasluClo hat
Existing Alibaba hat listing evidence kept for comparison.
Supplier chat saying the piece produced is on the site without the supplier logo and next time caps need to be designed themselves
Supplier chat: "next time we need to design the caps ourselves" with the supplier's help.
Alibaba match Product page

The baselayer evidence points toward supplier/OEM sourcing.

The Hinoko baselayer page shows a $98 ManasluClo product. The supplier chat shows a matching baselayer image, and the Alibaba listing shows a customizable merino baselayer.

  • ManasluClo product page: Hinoko baselayer at $98.
  • Supplier chat shows a matching baselayer image.
  • Alibaba listing shows customizable merino baselayer options.
ManasluClo Hinoko baselayer product page showing 98 dollar price
ManasluClo Hinoko baselayer product page: $98.
Supplier chat showing a black baselayer image resembling the ManasluClo Hinoko baselayer
Supplier chat showing the matching baselayer image.
Alibaba custom merino wool baselayer listing with custom logo options
Alibaba customizable merino baselayer listing.
Photo matches Side-by-side

The Arc'teryx and Montane image comparisons are hard to ignore.

This is the cleanest photo-match evidence: side-by-side screenshots show ManasluClo using images that match outdoor-brand source photos. The issue is not that the products look similar. The issue is matching model, pose, gear, and composition.

  • Montane comparison: same model, pose, gear, and composition; jacket color changed.
  • Arc'teryx comparison: side-by-side source/photo match evidence.
  • These are stronger than generic "looks similar" product claims.
Side-by-side comparison of ManasluClo and Montane product photo showing same model and pose
Montane side-by-side comparison.
Side-by-side comparison showing ManasluClo and Arc'teryx product photo match evidence
Arc'teryx side-by-side comparison.
Original outdoor brand product image used for comparison
Original outdoor-brand image preserved for comparison.
ManasluClo product image comparison screenshot
ManasluClo image used for direct comparison.
Hype countdowns Hype pattern Supplier/OEM questions

They use countdowns to create hype around products with supplier evidence attached.

ManasluClo uses countdown and early-access style screens to turn drops into urgency. That is normal marketing when the sourcing story is clean. It looks different when the same products are surrounded by supplier chats, Alibaba-facing material, and photo-match evidence.

  • The supplier screenshots matter more than the countdowns, but the countdowns explain the sales tactic.
  • Countdown / early-access drops create urgency without proving design, manufacturing, or testing.
  • For safety-adjacent outdoor clothing, hype should not replace verification.

Record Snapshot

Kept compact so this section supports the evidence instead of swallowing the page.

The public record is narrow.

This page is about the German Manaslu Clothing UG / ManasluClo evidence. The public-facing record points to a small German UG, privacy-shielded domain details, one EU trademark record, and a US filing that was rejected/refused.

German UG EUR 500 capital WHOIS privacy No public test reports found

The hype funnel matters.

Countdown drops create a scarcity loop around products that the supplier evidence suggests may be supplier/OEM-sourced. That is why the screenshots matter: they show what the marketing does not explain.

  • Countdown and early-access drops can build hype without proving technical claims.
  • Scarcity marketing does not answer sourcing, testing, or product-photo questions.
  • The strongest proof remains the supplier chats and photo-match comparisons above.
Entity focusManaslu Clothing UG (haftungsbeschraenkt), Hamburg, HRB 191125.
Listed peoplePublic register mirrors list Bent Aaron Berges and Lennart Felber as managing directors.
CapitalPublic register mirrors list EUR 500 stated share capital.
Domainmanasluclo.com, created August 2, 2024; registrar shown through Tucows / Shopify sources.
WHOISRegistrant details hidden through Contact Privacy Inc. in domain lookup data.
TrademarkOne MANASLU-related EU trademark record found. The US filing found here was rejected/refused and is not a US trademark registration.
TestingNo public CE/EN lab reports, third-party garment test reports, or full product safety files found in the evidence reviewed here.

Claims Vs Evidence

Short, readable, and tied to what is actually shown on this page.

ClaimEvidenceWhy it matters
"Premium alpine gear" Supplier chats, Alibaba listings, product-photo matches, and missing public lab reports found here. Premium technical gear needs transparent materials, testing, sourcing, and manufacturing proof.
"We make/design this ourselves" Supplier chats show branded vests, caps being stitched, and messages saying the supplier produced the item. Direct supplier evidence is stronger than marketing language.
"The products are not Alibaba/OEM" Alibaba-style listings, supplier chat screenshots, and branded product images appear together in the evidence set. If the sourcing story is different, Manaslu can publish supplier, factory, and testing records.
"Our names are registered internationally" One EU record found. The US filing found here was rejected/refused. A narrow EU trademark record is not broad international registration.
"Those product visuals are original" Arc'teryx and Montane side-by-side screenshots show matching model, pose, gear, and composition. Original product photography should not match another brand's product imagery across model, pose, gear, and composition.
"Ask us about every single thing" Countdown and early-access marketing builds urgency while supplier, testing, and product-photo questions remain unanswered. Transparency requires public verification, not just drop hype during scrutiny.

Chronology

Ordered oldest to newest so the sequence makes sense.

Aug 2, 2024

manasluclo.com domain created. Domain lookup data identifies Tucows / Shopify-related infrastructure and privacy-shielded registrant details.

Mar 4, 2025

Manaslu Clothing UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) appears in Hamburg register mirrors with HRB 191125 and EUR 500 share capital.

Jul 19, 2025

WHOIS record updated while registrant identity remains hidden through Contact Privacy Inc.

Feb-Mar 2026

Evidence page and community threads spread allegations about Alibaba/OEM sourcing, product-photo matches, and missing technical proof.

Mar 2026

ManasluClo uses countdown / early-access drop marketing while evidence spreads about supplier chats, product-photo matches, and missing technical proof.

May 31, 2026

Netlify says it will not take action against this site at that stage unless Manaslu provides a specific copyright claim.

Jun 2, 2026

This evidence page is tightened to focus on the German Manaslu Clothing UG record, the strongest proof assets, the corrected trademark status, and the DMCA PDF record.

PDF proof Takedown attempt

Manaslu tried to take this site offline. Netlify did not take it down.

Manaslu submitted a DMCA takedown complaint against this criticism site. The complaint leaned on reputation, consumer-confusion, business-harm, and false-association arguments. Netlify did not take action at that stage without a specific copyright claim.

Manaslu accused this site of copyright infringement while this same evidence file shows ManasluClo product images matching Arc'teryx and Montane source photos. Arc'teryx says its website content is owned by Arc'teryx and protected by copyright.

Plain English: this site uses screenshots as evidence and criticism. The evidence reviewed here shows ManasluClo product images matching Arc'teryx source images in commercial marketing. Those are not the same thing; the linked Arc'teryx terms identify its site content as protected. Source: Arc'teryx Terms of Use

Read the takedown record Open the PDF proof